An article written by William Schambra (recently appearing in the Chronicle of Philanthropy) discusses philanthropy’s move toward becoming a profession. Schambra does it in the context of The Philanthropist, an eight-part NBC summer series.
To give you a quick overview of the show, corporate mogul Teddy Rist (played by James Purefoy) is the series’ main character who, after completing a Nigerian oil deal, sees a small boy huddled in a corner and feels compelled to help. After Rist returns to his New York headquarters, the corporation’s foundation takes on the task of helping the kid. Not convinced enough is being done, Rist embarks on philanthropic adventures and engages in arguments with the corporate giving staff on just what things should be done and when.
Through Rist’s interactions with the foundation’s staff, viewers are presented with two perspectives on philanthropy: one is from the gut and taps into the simplicity of “those who have” helping “those who don’t,” and the other involves time, research, skill, and the ability to deliver results. This brings us to the main question: is philanthropy as simple as giving money to a problem or does it involve certain skills and education in order to be done effectively?
The answer seems evident based on the increase of nonprofit staff members seeking degrees in the management of social programs (there is actually a Ph.D. in Philanthropy) and the emergence of institutions providing that training and education.
I don’t pretend to know what the future holds but what I do know is that many nonprofits are closing their doors as the economy struggles to recover. So, I would “bet the farm,” so to speak, that philanthropy will become a new profession as people try to create dogma, best practices, and strategies to standardize a skill set that so many organizations desperately need. It will be an exciting time in the philanthropic world as we watch a new profession emerge.






